Comparative and meta-analysis evaluation of non-destructive testing methods for strength assessment of cemented paste backfill: implications for sustainable pavement and concrete materials

Abstract

by providing structural support and reducing surface subsidence. While traditional destructive testing methods such as unconfined compressive strength (UCS) tests offer valuable understanding of material strength, they require a lot of resources, are time-consuming, and environmentally unfriendly. However, non-destructive testing (NDT) techniques such as ultrasonic pulse velocity (UPV), electrical resistivity (ER), and acoustic emission (AE) provide sustainable alternatives by preserving sample integrity, minimizing waste, and enabling real-time monitoring. This study systematically reviews and quantitatively compares the effectiveness of UPV, ER, and AE in predicting the strength of CPB. Meta-analysis of 30 peer-reviewed studies reveals that UPV and AE provide the most consistent and reliable correlations with UCS, with R2 values of 0.895 and 0.896, respectively, while ER shows more variability due to its sensitivity to environmental factors. Additionally, a synthetic model combining UPV, AE and ER demonstrates improved accuracy in predicting strength. This hybrid approach enhances predictions of material performance while supporting sustainability in mining and construction. Our research advocates for better testing practices and presents a promising direction for future infrastructure projects, where real-time, non-invasive monitoring can enhance material performance evaluation and optimize resource use.