Basit öğe kaydını göster

dc.contributor.authorAksoy, Fikret
dc.contributor.authorDemiral, Gökhan
dc.contributor.authorEkinci, Özgür
dc.date.accessioned2020-12-19T19:41:36Z
dc.date.available2020-12-19T19:41:36Z
dc.date.issued2018
dc.identifier.citationAksoy, F., Demiral, G., & Ekinci, Ö. (2018). Can the timing of laparoscopic cholecystectomy after biliary pancreatitis change the conversion rate to open surgery?. Asian journal of surgery, 41(4), 307–312. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asjsur.2017.02.001en_US
dc.identifier.issn1015-9584
dc.identifier.issn0219-3108
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.asjsur.2017.02.001
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11436/1799
dc.descriptionEkinci, Ozgur/0000-0002-2020-1913en_US
dc.descriptionWOS: 000446397200003en_US
dc.descriptionPubMed: 28284749en_US
dc.description.abstractBackground: Biliary pancreatitis (BP) constitutes 30-55% of all cases of acute pancreatitis. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) has become the gold standard for the surgical treatment of gallbladder disease. We aimed to compare and evaluate the relation between the timing of LC and the rates and reasons of conversion to open surgery (OS) after BP. Methods: Data were collected of patients who presented for the first time with acute BP and underwent LC. the patients were divided into two groups: early cholecystectomy (Group 1), patients who underwent cholecystectomy during the first pancreatitis attack upon admission and before discharge from hospital (1-3 days); and late cholecystectomy (Group 2), patients who received medical treatment during their first pancreatitis episode and underwent surgery after 4-10 weeks. Sex, Ranson scores, American Society of Anesthesiology scores, and conversion reasons were compared. Results: Group 1 and Group 2 included 75 patients (20 men, 55 women) and 87 patients (25 men, 62 women), respectively. the mean age was 44.7 years (range, 21-82 years). Obscure anatomy with adhesions was detected in 16 patients (5 in Group 1, 11 in Group 2) as the leading cause of conversion to OS, but it was not statistically significant (p=0.054). Acute inflammation with empyema and peripancreatic liquid collection was observed in 14 patients (12 in Group 1, 2 in Group 2), and conversion to OS was statistically significantly higher in Group 1 (p=0.016). Conclusion: Timing of LC does not influence the conversion rates to OS after BP. (C) 2017 Asian Surgical Association and Taiwan Robotic Surgical Association. Publishing services by Elsevier B.V.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherElsevier Singapore Pte Ltden_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen_US
dc.subjectConversion to open surgeryen_US
dc.subjectLaparoscopic cholecystectomyen_US
dc.subjectPancreatitisen_US
dc.titleCan the timing of laparoscopic cholecystectomy after biliary pancreatitis change the conversion rate to open surgery?en_US
dc.typearticleen_US
dc.contributor.departmentRTEÜ, Tıp Fakültesi, Cerrahi Tıp Bilimleri Bölümüen_US
dc.contributor.institutionauthorDemiral, Gökhan
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.asjsur.2017.02.001
dc.identifier.volume41en_US
dc.identifier.issue4en_US
dc.identifier.startpage307en_US
dc.identifier.endpage312en_US
dc.ri.editoaen_US
dc.relation.journalAsian Journal of Surgeryen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US


Bu öğenin dosyaları:

Thumbnail

Bu öğe aşağıdaki koleksiyon(lar)da görünmektedir.

Basit öğe kaydını göster