• Türkçe
    • English
  • English 
    • Türkçe
    • English
  • Login
View Item 
  •   RTEÜ
  • Araştırma Çıktıları | TR-Dizin | WoS | Scopus | PubMed
  • WoS İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu
  • View Item
  •   RTEÜ
  • Araştırma Çıktıları | TR-Dizin | WoS | Scopus | PubMed
  • WoS İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu
  • View Item
JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

Analytical solution of a contact problem and comparison with the results from FEM

Access

info:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccess

Date

2015

Author

Öner, Erdal
Yaylacı, Murat
Birinci, Ahmet

Metadata

Show full item record

Citation

Oner, E., Yaylaci, M., Birinci, A. (2015). Analytical solution of a contact problem and comparison with the results from FEM. Structural Engineering and Mechanics, 54(4), 607–622. https://doi.org/10.12989/SEM.2015.54.4.607

Abstract

This paper presents a comparative study of analytical method and finite element method (FEM) for analysis of a continuous contact problem. the problem consists of two elastic layers loaded by means of a rigid circular punch and resting on semi-infinite plane. It is assumed that all surfaces are frictionless and only compressive normal fractions can be transmitted through the contact areas. Firstly, analytical solution of the problem is obtained by using theory of elasticity and integral transform techniques. Then, finite element model of the problem is constituted using ANSYS software and the two dimensional analysis of the problem is carried out. the contact stresses under rigid circular punch, the contact areas, normal stresses along the axis of symmetry are obtained for both solutions. the results show that contact stresses and the normal stresses obtained from finite element method (FEM) provide boundary conditions of the problem as well as analytical results. Also, the contact areas obtained from finite element method are very close to results obtained from analytical method; disagree by 0.03-1.61% Finally, it can be said that there is a good agreement between two methods.

Source

Structural Engineering and Mechanics

Volume

54

Issue

4

URI

https://doi.org/10.12989/sem.2015.54.4.607
https://hdl.handle.net/11436/2827

Collections

  • İnşaat Mühendisliği Bölümü Koleksiyonu [261]
  • Scopus İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu [6023]
  • WoS İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu [5260]



DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
Contact Us | Send Feedback
Theme by 
@mire NV
 

 




| Instruction | Guide | Contact |

DSpace@RTEÜ

by OpenAIRE
Advanced Search

sherpa/romeo

Browse

All of DSpaceCommunities & CollectionsBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsTypeLanguageDepartmentCategoryPublisherAccess TypeInstitution AuthorThis CollectionBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsTypeLanguageDepartmentCategoryPublisherAccess TypeInstitution Author

My Account

LoginRegister

Statistics

View Google Analytics Statistics

DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
Contact Us | Send Feedback
Theme by 
@mire NV
 

 


|| Guide|| Instruction || Library || Recep Tayyip Erdoğan University || OAI-PMH ||

Recep Tayyip Erdoğan University, Rize, Turkey
If you find any errors in content, please contact:

Creative Commons License
Recep Tayyip Erdoğan University Institutional Repository is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 4.0 Unported License..

DSpace@RTEÜ:


DSpace 6.2

tarafından İdeal DSpace hizmetleri çerçevesinde özelleştirilerek kurulmuştur.