Basit öğe kaydını göster

dc.contributor.authorKaradaş, Muhammet
dc.date.accessioned2022-09-27T07:51:51Z
dc.date.available2022-09-27T07:51:51Z
dc.date.issued2021en_US
dc.identifier.citationKaradas, M. (2021). Evaluation of bonding strength of universal adhesives to aged composite resin. Journal of Adhesion Science and Technology, 36(4), 410-423. https://doi.org/10.1080/01694243.2021.1922223en_US
dc.identifier.issn0169-4243
dc.identifier.issn1568-5616
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1080/01694243.2021.1922223
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11436/6558
dc.description.abstractThis study aimed to assess the microtensile bond strength (mu TBS) of universal adhesives to the aged micro-hybrid composite resin before and after thermocycling (TC). Composite blocks prepared from micro-hybrid composite resin were subjected to 5000 TC. The aged blocks were horizontally cut into two halves, and then the specimens were randomly assigned to two groups for surface preparation (#600-grit or #180-grit SiC paper). After surface grinding, the specimens in each group were assigned to four subgroups: (1) All-Bond Universal, (2) Scotch Bond Universal, (3) Tokuyama Universal Bond, and (4) control (non-adhesive). After applying adhesives, the specimens were completed with the same brand composite resin. Composite sticks were obtained and then stressed using a universal testing machine at 24 h or after 30,000 TC. The fractured surfaces were observed using a stereomicroscope. Data were evaluated using one-way ANOVA and Weibull model. The surface porosity of aged composite specimens did not affect the mu TBS of adhesives, regardless of aging conditions. All adhesives presented significantly higher mu TBS than the non-adhesive group. There were no significant differences among mu TBS of adhesives, except 180 grinding surfaces at 24 h, which Scotch Bond Universal showed significantly higher mu TBS than other adhesives. The mu TBS of all adhesives reduced after TC. TC had a significant effect on the bonding durability of the universal adhesives. After TC, the survival probability of overall mu TBS presented differences among adhesives.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherTaylor & Francis Ltd.en_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessen_US
dc.subjectBond strengthen_US
dc.subjectComposite repairen_US
dc.subjectSurface porosityen_US
dc.subjectUniversal adhesiveen_US
dc.subjectThermocyclingen_US
dc.titleEvaluation of bonding strength of universal adhesives to aged composite resinen_US
dc.typearticleen_US
dc.contributor.departmentRTEÜ, Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi, Klinik Bilimler Bölümüen_US
dc.contributor.institutionauthorKaradaş, Muhammet
dc.identifier.doi10.1080/01694243.2021.1922223en_US
dc.identifier.volume36en_US
dc.identifier.issue4en_US
dc.identifier.startpage410en_US
dc.identifier.endpage423en_US
dc.relation.journalJournal of Adhesion Science and Technologyen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US


Bu öğenin dosyaları:

Thumbnail

Bu öğe aşağıdaki koleksiyon(lar)da görünmektedir.

Basit öğe kaydını göster