Basit öğe kaydını göster

dc.contributor.authorKaya, Ayberk
dc.contributor.authorTarakçı, Ümit Cihat
dc.date.accessioned2022-09-28T11:36:06Z
dc.date.available2022-09-28T11:36:06Z
dc.date.issued2021en_US
dc.identifier.citationKAya, A: & Tarakci, U.C. (2021). Stability Investigation of a Deep Shaft Using Different Methods. International Journal of Geomechanics, 21(2), 05020009. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)GM.1943-5622.0001917en_US
dc.identifier.issn1532-3641
dc.identifier.issn1943-5622
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)GM.1943-5622.0001917
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11436/6582
dc.description.abstractThe New Zigana Tunnel is, at 14.5 km long, the longest highway tunnel project in Turkey. In this project, it is planned to construct two service shafts to provide access to outside the tunnel and temporary ventilation. Service Shaft 2 (o = 2.60 m), which is 220 m in depth, was opened by the raise boring machine (RBM) method. In this study, the wall stability of Service Shaft 2 was investigated using empirical analysis, analytical analysis, and numerical simulation methods. To define the rock masses on the shaft route, the rock mass rating (RMR), Q, and geological strength index (GSI) classification systems were utilized as an empirical approach. The rock-support interaction and convergence-confinement methods were applied in the analytical analysis of wall stability. To determine the plastic zones that occurred around the unsupported shaft walls, 2D and 3D numerical simulations (FEM-based) were used. According to the results of empirical analysis, there is no need for support to ensure the stability of shaft walls. Conversely, the analytical and numerical methods exhibited more conservative results than other methods and suggested support application for stability. According to the convergence-confinement method and 2D FEM simulation, the plastic zone around the shaft walls developed after depths of 105 and 81 m, respectively. Finally, the results obtained from these analyses were compared with actual field situations, and their compatibility was investigated. It was concluded that, of these analysis methods, 2D FEM simulation is most compatible with the actual field data.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherASCE- American Society of Civil Engineersen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessen_US
dc.subjectShaft stabilityen_US
dc.subjectAnalytical analysisen_US
dc.subjectEmpirical analysisen_US
dc.subjectNumerical simulationen_US
dc.titleStability investigation of a deep shaft using different methodsen_US
dc.typearticleen_US
dc.contributor.departmentRTEÜ, Mühendislik ve Mimarlık Fakültesi, İnşaat Mühendisliği Bölümüen_US
dc.contributor.institutionauthorKaya, Ayberk
dc.contributor.institutionauthorTarakçı, Ümit Cihat
dc.identifier.doi10.1061/(ASCE)GM.1943-5622.0001917en_US
dc.identifier.volume21en_US
dc.identifier.issue2en_US
dc.identifier.startpage05020009en_US
dc.relation.journalInternational Journal of Geomechanicsen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US


Bu öğenin dosyaları:

DosyalarBoyutBiçimGöster

Bu öğe ile ilişkili dosya yok.

Bu öğe aşağıdaki koleksiyon(lar)da görünmektedir.

Basit öğe kaydını göster