• Türkçe
    • English
  • English 
    • Türkçe
    • English
  • Login
View Item 
  •   RTEÜ
  • Araştırma Çıktıları | TR-Dizin | WoS | Scopus | PubMed
  • WoS İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu
  • View Item
  •   RTEÜ
  • Araştırma Çıktıları | TR-Dizin | WoS | Scopus | PubMed
  • WoS İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu
  • View Item
JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

Comparing Urban Parks' woody plant diversity in seven different locations of Turkey

Thumbnail

View/Open

Full Text / Tam Metin (3.770Mb)

Access

info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess

Date

2022

Author

Öğçe, Hüseyin
Şatıroğlu, Elif
Bekiryazıcı, Fatih
Dinçer, Deryanur

Metadata

Show full item record

Citation

Ogce, H., Satiroglu, E., Bekiryazici, F. & Dincer, D. (2022). Comparing Urban Parks' Woody Plant Diversity in Seven Different Locations of Turkey. Forestist, 72(3), 266-274. http://doi.org/10.54614/forestist.2022.21038

Abstract

Plant diversity is critical to regulating the urban ecosystem and offers myriad positive benefits in a logical and well-planned structure. This article aims to demonstrate the woody plant diversity of the selected urban parks and their importance for the urban ecosystem. As a material, seven urban parks were selected from different locations in Turkey, located in Aydin, Istanbul, Kayseri, Samsun, Rize, Trabzon, and Van. In methodology, we recorded the plants' families and species and calculated the diversity and dissimilarity values of the selected urban parks through Shannon (alpha) and Whittaker (beta) indexes on the Paleontological Statistics and Biodiversity Component Calculation Software programs. The results showed that 71 plant species belonging to 32 families were recorded, and the most dominant families were Pinaceae and Rosaceae. As a result of planting design styles, the non-native woody plant species were higher than the native ones. Moreover, the alpha diversity of seven parks was 0.4099 (Park I), 1.931 (Park II), 1.936 (Park III), 2.564 (Park IV), 2.622 (Park V), 2.124 (Park VI), and 1.881 (VII) values. On the other hand, the beta results showed that the highest similarity value (1 - dissimilarity) was 0.28 between Parks IV and V. In conclusion, there were huge differences among the selected parks concerning plant biodiversity because of limited native plants usage.

Source

Forestist

Volume

72

Issue

3

URI

http://doi.org/10.54614/forestist.2022.21038
https://hdl.handle.net/11436/7031

Collections

  • Peyzaj Mimarlığı Bölümü Koleksiyonu [81]
  • Scopus İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu [6023]
  • TR-Dizin İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu [2844]
  • WoS İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu [5260]



DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
Contact Us | Send Feedback
Theme by 
@mire NV
 

 




| Instruction | Guide | Contact |

DSpace@RTEÜ

by OpenAIRE
Advanced Search

sherpa/romeo

Browse

All of DSpaceCommunities & CollectionsBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsTypeLanguageDepartmentCategoryPublisherAccess TypeInstitution AuthorThis CollectionBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsTypeLanguageDepartmentCategoryPublisherAccess TypeInstitution Author

My Account

LoginRegister

Statistics

View Google Analytics Statistics

DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
Contact Us | Send Feedback
Theme by 
@mire NV
 

 


|| Guide|| Instruction || Library || Recep Tayyip Erdoğan University || OAI-PMH ||

Recep Tayyip Erdoğan University, Rize, Turkey
If you find any errors in content, please contact:

Creative Commons License
Recep Tayyip Erdoğan University Institutional Repository is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 4.0 Unported License..

DSpace@RTEÜ:


DSpace 6.2

tarafından İdeal DSpace hizmetleri çerçevesinde özelleştirilerek kurulmuştur.