Basit öğe kaydını göster

dc.contributor.authorGöksu, Muhammed Raşid
dc.contributor.authorGümrükçü, Zeynep
dc.contributor.authorBalaban, Emre
dc.contributor.authorMercantepe, Tolga
dc.contributor.authorGökçe, Fatih Mehmet
dc.date.accessioned2024-08-12T06:57:49Z
dc.date.available2024-08-12T06:57:49Z
dc.date.issued2024en_US
dc.identifier.citationGöksu, M. R., Gümrükçü, Z., Balaban, E., Mercantepe, T., & Gökçe, F. M. (2024). Electrophysiological and histopathological evaluation of the effectiveness of melatonin and glatiramer acetate for traumatic facial nerve injuries. Injury, 55(10), 111719. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.injury.2024.111719en_US
dc.identifier.issn0020-1383
dc.identifier.issn1879-0267
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.injury.2024.111719
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11436/9208
dc.description.abstractAim: This study aimed to evaluate the effect of systemic/local use of melatonin and glatiramer acetate on regeneration in traumatic nerve injury models. Materials and methods: A total of 42 male Wistar albino rats were randomly divided into 6 groups: healthy control (Group 1), injured control (Group 2), local melatonin (Group 3), systemic melatonin (Group 4), local glatiramer acetate (Group 5), and systemic glatiramer acetate (Group 6). In all groups, electromyography recordings of the facial nerve were obtained after surgery and before sacrifice, and the damaged nerve region was histopathologically examined after sacrifice. Results: In the electrophysiological evaluation, the control group had the greatest decrease in amplitude and extension in latency time following surgery than the treatment groups. Furthermore, a significant decrease in the degenerative axon count, edematous areas, and fibrotic areas as well as a significant increase in axonal surface areas was observed in all the treatment groups compared with the damage control group. Conclusions: Although both glatiramer acetate and melatonin are beneficial in regeneration in traumatic facial nerve injuries, it can be concluded that systemic use of melatonin can yield more positive results than glatiramer acetate and local use of both two drugs.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherElsevieren_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessen_US
dc.subjectFacial nerve injuryen_US
dc.subjectMelatoninen_US
dc.subjectGlatiramer acetateen_US
dc.subjectPeripheral nerve regenerationen_US
dc.titleElectrophysiological and histopathological evaluation of the effectiveness of melatonin and glatiramer acetate for traumatic facial nerve injuriesen_US
dc.typearticleen_US
dc.contributor.departmentRTEÜ, Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi, Klinik Bilimler Bölümüen_US
dc.contributor.institutionauthorGümrükçü, Zeynep
dc.contributor.institutionauthorBalaban, Emre
dc.contributor.institutionauthorMercantepe, Tolga
dc.contributor.institutionauthorGökçe, Fatih Mehmet
dc.identifier.volume55en_US
dc.identifier.issue10en_US
dc.identifier.startpage111719en_US
dc.relation.journalInjuryen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US


Bu öğenin dosyaları:

Bu öğe aşağıdaki koleksiyon(lar)da görünmektedir.

Basit öğe kaydını göster