Basit öğe kaydını göster

dc.contributor.authorDurak, Hüseyin
dc.contributor.authorErgül, Elif
dc.date.accessioned2024-09-09T07:22:39Z
dc.date.available2024-09-09T07:22:39Z
dc.date.issued2024en_US
dc.identifier.citationDurak, H., & Ergül, E. (2024). Association of induced atrial fibrillation in the electrophysiology laboratory with endothelial dysfunction and documented atrial fibrillation. International Journal of Cardiology, 415, 132465. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijcard.2024.132465en_US
dc.identifier.issn0167-5273
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijcard.2024.132465
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11436/9296
dc.description.abstractObjective: Atrial fibrillation (AF) is a common arrhythmia that increases morbidity and mortality, as well as healthcare costs. The induction of AF (IAF) during programmed atrial pacing in an electrophysiological study (EPS) is a prevalent phenomenon that has been underappreciated by electrophysiologists. Despite extensive research on AF, only a few studies have focused on this phenomenon. The aim of our study was to investigate the association between history of AF and IAF and the underlying pathophysiological factors such as arterial stiffness, subclinical atherosclerosis, and impaired endothelial function. Methods: This cross-sectional and observational study included 87 patients who had palpitations and were scheduled for EPS. Patients underwent biochemical investigations, transthoracic echocardiography, carotid ultrasound, carotid-femoral artery pulse wave velocity (PWV), and flow-mediated dilatation (FMD) measurements before EPS. Patients were divided into two groups, AF-induced and non-induced in EPS, for further statistical analysis. Results: AF was induced in 16 of 87 patients (18.3%) included in the analysis. The FMD (%) was significantly lower (16.01 ± 10.1 vs. 8.7 ± 5.7, P = 0.022) and, remarkably, the proportion of patients with a history of AF was significantly higher (2.8% vs. 37.5%, P < 0.001) in the IAF group. ROC analysis showed that a documented AF and FMD predicted IAF, with AUC of 0.741 (p = 0.012) and 0.740 (p = 0.001), respectively. Logistic regression analysis revealed that FMD and history of AF were strong predictors of IAF (odds ratio [OR], 0.853; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.737–0.988; P = 0.034, OR: 10.1, 95% CI 4.9–20.5; P = 0.003, respectively). Conclusion: Endothelial dysfunction and documented AF were associated with IAF during EPS.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherElsevieren_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessen_US
dc.subjectAtrial fibrillationen_US
dc.subjectDocumented atrial fibrillationen_US
dc.subjectEndothelial dysfunctionen_US
dc.subjectInduction of atrial fibrillationen_US
dc.titleAssociation of induced atrial fibrillation in the electrophysiology laboratory with endothelial dysfunction and documented atrial fibrillationen_US
dc.typearticleen_US
dc.contributor.departmentRTEÜ, Tıp Fakültesi, Dahili Tıp Bilimleri Bölümüen_US
dc.contributor.institutionauthorDurak, Hüseyin
dc.contributor.institutionauthorErgül, Elif
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.ijcard.2024.132465en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.ijcard.2024.132465en_US
dc.identifier.volume415en_US
dc.identifier.startpage1322465en_US
dc.relation.journalInternational Journal of Cardiologyen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US


Bu öğenin dosyaları:

Bu öğe aşağıdaki koleksiyon(lar)da görünmektedir.

Basit öğe kaydını göster