Basit öğe kaydını göster

dc.contributor.authorBalaban, Emre
dc.contributor.authorDemir, Emine
dc.contributor.authorÇelebi Erdivanlı, Özlem
dc.contributor.authorMercantepe, Tolga
dc.contributor.authorGökçe, Fatih Mehmet
dc.contributor.authorTümkaya, Levent
dc.contributor.authorDursun, Engin
dc.date.accessioned2024-10-10T06:56:04Z
dc.date.available2024-10-10T06:56:04Z
dc.date.issued2024en_US
dc.identifier.citationBalaban, E., Demir, E., Erdivanlı, Ö. Ç., Mercantepe, T., Gökçe, F. M., Tümkaya, L., & Dursun, E. (2024). The Effectiveness of Concentrated Growth Factor in Facial Nerve Crush Injury. Journal of Stomatology, Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, 102071. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jormas.2024.102071en_US
dc.identifier.issn2468-7855
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.jormas.2024.102071
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11436/9560
dc.description.abstractAim: To evaluate the effect of concentrated growth factor (CGF) on regeneration of facial nerve after crush injury. Materials and Methods: Fourteen rats were randomized into two groups. The control group (CG) (n = 7) received a crush injury to the right facial nerve. The CGF group (CGFG) (n = 7) received a crush injury to the right facial nerve and concentrated growth factor prepared from their own blood thereafter. Left facial nerves were used for functional comparison. Nerve function was evaluated using whisker movements and electromyography. Histologic properties were evaluated using hematoxylin and eosin and Masson-trichrome staining, and immunohistochemical properties were evaluated using Neurofilament-H and Anti-Tau degeneration markers. Results: In the CGFG, whisker functions began to recover earlier and recovered more quickly compared with the CG. The CG showed significantly prolonged latency and reduced amplitudes in the first week compared with the CGFG (p < 0.05). Recordings of 4th-week latency and amplitudes were similar to the preoperative period in the CGFG (p > 0.05), whereas recordings of the same week were significantly worse in the CG (p < 0.05). Edema and fibrosis were also more pronounced in the CG compared with the CGFG. Neurofilament-H and Anti-Tau were at significantly high levels in the CG (p < 0.05). Conclusion: Concentrated growth factor promotes recovery in facial crush injury and may prove a cost-effective, practical, and effective treatment choice in peripheral nerve injury.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherElsevieren_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessen_US
dc.subjectCrush injuriesen_US
dc.subjectFacial nerveen_US
dc.subjectFacial palsyen_US
dc.subjectGrowth factoren_US
dc.subjectRegenerationen_US
dc.titleThe effectiveness of concentrated growth factor in facial nerve crush injuryen_US
dc.typearticleen_US
dc.contributor.departmentRTEÜ, Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi, Klinik Bilimler Bölümüen_US
dc.contributor.institutionauthorBalaban, Emre
dc.contributor.institutionauthorÇelebi Erdivanlı, Özlem
dc.contributor.institutionauthorMercantepe, Tolga
dc.contributor.institutionauthorGökçe, Fatih Mehmet
dc.contributor.institutionauthorTümkaya, Levent
dc.identifier.startpage102071en_US
dc.relation.journalJournal of Stomatology, Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeryen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US


Bu öğenin dosyaları:

Bu öğe aşağıdaki koleksiyon(lar)da görünmektedir.

Basit öğe kaydını göster