• Türkçe
    • English
  • English 
    • Türkçe
    • English
  • Login
View Item 
  •   RTEÜ
  • Araştırma Çıktıları | TR-Dizin | WoS | Scopus | PubMed
  • WoS İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu
  • View Item
  •   RTEÜ
  • Araştırma Çıktıları | TR-Dizin | WoS | Scopus | PubMed
  • WoS İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu
  • View Item
JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

Investigation of the effects of storage time on the dimensional accuracy of impression materials using cone beam computed tomography

Thumbnail

View/Open

Full Text / Tam Metin (1.019Mb)

Access

info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess

Date

2016

Author

Alkurt, Murat
Duymuş, Zeynep Yeşil
Dedeoğlu, Numan

Metadata

Show full item record

Citation

Alkurt, M., Duymus, Z.Y., Dedeoglu, N. (2016). Investigation of the effects of storage time on the dimensional accuracy of impression materials using cone beam computed tomography. Journal of Advanced Prosthodontics, 8(5), 380-387. https://doi.org/10.4047/jap.2016.8.5.380

Abstract

PURPOSE. the storage conditions of impressions affect the dimensional accuracy of the impression materials. the aim of the study was to assess the effects of storage time on dimensional accuracy of five different impression materials by cone beam computed tomography (CBCT). MATERIALS AND METHODS. Polyether (Impregum), hydrocolloid (Hydrogum and Alginoplast), and silicone (Zetaflow and Honigum) impression materials were used for impressions taken from an acrylic master model. the impressions were poured and subjected to four different storage times: immediate use, and 1, 3, and 5 days of storage. Line 1 (between right and left first molar mesiobuccal cusp tips) and Line 2 (between right and left canine tips) were measured on a CBCT scanned model, and time dependent mean differences were analyzed by two-way univariate and Duncan's test (alpha=.05). RESULTS. For Line 1, the total mean difference of Impregum and Hydrogum were statistically different from Alginoplast (P<.05), while Zetaflow and Honigum had smaller discrepancies. Alginoplast resulted in more difference than the other impressions (P<.05). For Line 2, the total mean difference of Impregum was statistically different from the other impressions. Significant differences were observed in Line 1 and Line 2 for the different storage periods (P<.05). CONCLUSION. the dimensional accuracy of impression material is clinically acceptable if the impression material is stored in suitable conditions.

Source

Journal of Advanced Prosthodontics

Volume

8

Issue

5

URI

https://doi.org/10.4047/jap.2016.8.5.380
https://hdl.handle.net/11436/2396

Collections

  • DŞHF, Klinik Bilimler Bölümü Koleksiyonu [254]
  • PubMed İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu [2443]
  • Scopus İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu [6032]
  • WoS İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu [5260]



DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
Contact Us | Send Feedback
Theme by 
@mire NV
 

 




| Instruction | Guide | Contact |

DSpace@RTEÜ

by OpenAIRE
Advanced Search

sherpa/romeo

Browse

All of DSpaceCommunities & CollectionsBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsTypeLanguageDepartmentCategoryPublisherAccess TypeInstitution AuthorThis CollectionBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsTypeLanguageDepartmentCategoryPublisherAccess TypeInstitution Author

My Account

LoginRegister

Statistics

View Google Analytics Statistics

DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
Contact Us | Send Feedback
Theme by 
@mire NV
 

 


|| Guide|| Instruction || Library || Recep Tayyip Erdoğan University || OAI-PMH ||

Recep Tayyip Erdoğan University, Rize, Turkey
If you find any errors in content, please contact:

Creative Commons License
Recep Tayyip Erdoğan University Institutional Repository is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 4.0 Unported License..

DSpace@RTEÜ:


DSpace 6.2

tarafından İdeal DSpace hizmetleri çerçevesinde özelleştirilerek kurulmuştur.