• Türkçe
    • English
  • English 
    • Türkçe
    • English
  • Login
View Item 
  •   RTEÜ
  • Araştırma Çıktıları | TR-Dizin | WoS | Scopus | PubMed
  • TR-Dizin İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu
  • View Item
  •   RTEÜ
  • Araştırma Çıktıları | TR-Dizin | WoS | Scopus | PubMed
  • TR-Dizin İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu
  • View Item
JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

Efficacy of thoracic ultrasonography in thoracostomy tube removal

View/Open

Tam Metin / Full Text (550.4Kb)

Access

info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess

Date

2023

Author

Tülüce, Kerim
Hürsoy, Nur
Sevilgen, Gökçen
Türüt, Hasan

Metadata

Show full item record

Citation

Tülüce, K., Hürsoy, N., Sevilgen, G., & Türüt, H. (2023). Efficacy of thoracic ultrasonography in thoracostomy tube removal. Current Thoracic Surgery, 8(1), 52-57. https://doi.org/10.26663/cts.2023.008

Abstract

Background: Tube thoracostomy is the most commonly performed procedure in thoracic surgery. Follow- up with daily chest X-ray is performed for both pneumothorax patients and postoperative patients, but residual pneumothorax can often be missed on portable imaging in supine position. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of ultrasonography and chest X-ray by comparing these two methods in chest tube removal and thus determine whether ultrasonography is suitable for routine use in thoracic surgery clinics. Materials and Methods: This prospective study included a total of 28 patients who underwent tube thoracostomy in our center between December 2019 and December 2020 due to spontaneous pneumothorax (n = 16) or after wedge resection for different indications (n = 12). Chest X-ray and thoracic ultrasonography were performed before and after chest tube removal. The efficacy of thoracic ultrasonography compared to chest X-ray in the detection of residual pneumothorax was evaluated using specificity, sensitivity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV). Results: Twenty-four (85.7%) of the patients were male. The mean age was 40.25 ± 19.75 years (median, 39.5). Tube thoracotomy was performed on the right side in 18 patients (64.3%). Ultrasonography before tube removal had a PPV of 50%, NPV of 100%, sensitivity of 100%, and specificity of 96.3%. After tube removal, ultrasonography had a PPV of 100%, NPV of 96%, sensitivity of 75%, and specificity of 100%. Conclusions: The results of our comparison of chest X-ray and thoracic ultrasonography examinations performed before and after chest tube removal showed that thoracic ultrasonography was as effective as chest X-ray and can be used safely in clinics.

Source

Current Thoracic Surgery

Volume

8

Issue

1

URI

https://doi.org/10.26663/cts.2023.008
https://hdl.handle.net/11436/9378

Collections

  • TF, Cerrahi Tıp Bilimleri Bölümü Koleksiyonu [1225]
  • TF, Dahili Tıp Bilimleri Bölümü Koleksiyonu [1574]
  • TR-Dizin İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu [2844]



DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
Contact Us | Send Feedback
Theme by 
@mire NV
 

 




| Instruction | Guide | Contact |

DSpace@RTEÜ

by OpenAIRE
Advanced Search

sherpa/romeo

Browse

All of DSpaceCommunities & CollectionsBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsTypeLanguageDepartmentCategoryPublisherAccess TypeInstitution AuthorThis CollectionBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsTypeLanguageDepartmentCategoryPublisherAccess TypeInstitution Author

My Account

LoginRegister

Statistics

View Google Analytics Statistics

DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
Contact Us | Send Feedback
Theme by 
@mire NV
 

 


|| Guide|| Instruction || Library || Recep Tayyip Erdoğan University || OAI-PMH ||

Recep Tayyip Erdoğan University, Rize, Turkey
If you find any errors in content, please contact:

Creative Commons License
Recep Tayyip Erdoğan University Institutional Repository is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 4.0 Unported License..

DSpace@RTEÜ:


DSpace 6.2

tarafından İdeal DSpace hizmetleri çerçevesinde özelleştirilerek kurulmuştur.